Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1322

reference
825-tree-1
name
1322
tree-preservation-order

undefined

825-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.038129 50.870909)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.038044 50.870900,-1.038047 50.870917,-1.038059 50.870932,-1.038078 50.870944,-1.038101 50.870952,-1.038128 50.870955,-1.038154 50.870952,-1.038178 50.870945,-1.038197 50.870933,-1.038210 50.870918,-1.038214 50.870902,-1.038210 50.870885,-1.038198 50.870870,-1.038180 50.870858,-1.038156 50.870850,-1.038130 50.870847,-1.038104 50.870849,-1.038080 50.870857,-1.038061 50.870869,-1.038048 50.870884,-1.038044 50.870900)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL